Monday, July 7, 2014

Fukushima Emissions





The emissions were heavy when I started watching the TEPCO 1 cam (the old cam) today. They slowly cleared. At first I thought I was seeing fog, but then I saw that emissions were emanating directly from structures, visible on the TEPCO 2 cam. 

I ordinarily don’t watch TEPCO 2 cam, but today I started and sure enough it was very clear that today’s emissions visible on cam 1 were at least primarily coming from Unit 1 and the Common Spent Fuel Pool, as viewed from TEPCO cam 2:

Here is the visual evidence of emanations from the Common Spent Fuel Pool, which continued after Unit 1 emissions abated:

TEPCO CAM 2

TEPCO CAM 1

I’ve been making the argument for two years now (perhaps longer), that the Daiichi site has periodic emission events. Every Daiichi web-cam watcher knows this truth. The endless emission events are episodic. There are periods lasting days when emissions are frequent. Then, the emissions events slow down and are less visible on the cams, until the next big episode occurs.

How do I know emissions are not simply fog? I operationalize emissions as visible steam and sparks that emanate directly from buildings. The common spent fuel pool building is a common culprit, although units 1 and/or 2 also seem to produce steam.

The spiderweb phenomenon that is sometimes visible on the TEPCO 1 cam is closely linked with emission events AND high atmospheric humidity (see here). . I imagine spiderwebs will be visible around the typhoon slated to impact North East Japan this Wednesday (Japan Advised to Brace for Super-typhoon).
 
I wish I understood their nature. Many commentators at this blog have provided intriguing hypotheses on the spiderwebs' nature. 

Here are two well-reasoned comments both arguing that the Daiichi site constitutes an unprecedented, open-air radiation experiment:

COMMENT 1
Here is the link for yesterday’s post with the comment re-posted below: Spiderwebs and Deuterium. I’ve emphasized a few passages:

AnonymousJuly 6, 2014 at 9:42 PM I think it is something similar but I doubt we will ever know exactly what, since that would take real science and they are anti. I imagine its a combination of all the different radionuclides permeating the site, and when it rains and conditions are right, it creates huge vapor chamber type charges.

When its jumping from the smoke stack to the crane hundreds of feet up or through the number four reactor and out the top you can see the sheer size of some of those those bolts or arcs or plasma or whatever you want to call them. Also the tepcams are suspended above ground level, Im guessing 20-50 feet so that gives a little more impact when you see arcs and ball shapes rising up out of or hanging at the bottom of the camera frame.

I just can't get behind the anything on the lens theory, they are far too uniform, they often obviously follow the shape of structures, they are often different colors, and the light sourcing isnt the same. If it was a static light source reflecting through water drops, the light would always come from the same directions, even when its bending, like a round droplet. Wind pushing round droplets tends to distort their shape, and anything that was in the water like dirt or oil would leave a residue on the lens. And then when it changes color mid arc, that means the reflected light source would had to have changed color. Its easy to make orb-shaped light distortions using curved glass, but its hard using flat glass, you have to be underneath and in my experience its impossible using fans and a vertical glass pane.

So, I think it is something very similar to what you describe, who knows what with this amount of radiation and contamination spread across a irradiated water saturated facility, then with 3 coriums underneath. I think when it rains, and under the right conditions, the whole site turns into some kind of giant radiation battery conducting through the structures. I don't think we'll ever find out what it really is, but I think your on the right track, its just never happened before.

I do sometimes wonder if the whole fuku site isn't operating like a giant nuclear radio-telescope just beaming 24/7 in big slow circles into the universe...We are here (and probably not too bright).



COMMENT TWO
Comment on "Spiderwebs Today"

Majia,

Some of the events seen on the cams look like electrical events such as the red lightening, the ‘spiderwebs’, various glows in the air, captured while it was raining. The plumes of radiation rising in the air above Fukushima may be causing greater electrical activity or lightening during storms. Plasma requires an electric field. See more about Plasma and the Electric Universe model at:


http://www.holoscience.com/news/news.htm 

https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/
http://www.plasmacosmology.net/tech.html

The unusual radioactive conditions at Fukushima and the electrical activity of storms could be causing some of the unusual lights seen on the cams. The open air reactors at Fukushima, constantly emitting ionizing radiation, are a bigger problem than just the downwind radioactive fallout effects. The nuclear industry invites further disaster by allowing radioactive emissions to go unchecked. The following excerpt explains it better than I can and the book ties the science of the Electric Universe model to extreme weather phenomena and earthquakes explaining the science with clear, easy to understand terminology.

“Nuclear plants exhibit similar properties. They emit ionizing radiation which ‘scrape away’ electrons from molecules, creating positive and negative ions. [307] In the conductive plume, the negative ions are attracted to the top of the plume by the positive ionosphere, while the positive ions are attracted to the bottom of the plume by the Earth’s negative surface. The fact that nuclear plant plumes are mostly composed of water vapor, a good electric conductor, eases the ionic movement described above and the upward flow of free electrons from the ground to the top of the plume. On April 18th, 2013 the LaSalle nuclear plant in Illinois experienced an unusual incident: two of its reactors shut down and a radioactive venting procedure was carried out when it was struck by lightning. However, from 1992 to 2003, U.S. nuclear plants were struck by lightning 66 times, yet none of those strikes caused equipment damage or radioactive leakage. [309]

So, what really happened in LaSalle? Was the accident simply due to an insulator defect, as claimed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), [310] or was the source of this ‘lightning’ something out of the ordinary? Nuclear plants are very well protected with lightning prevention equipment, [311] but cometary discharges exhibit two major differences when compared to ‘normal’ lightning bolts: their polarity is reversed [312] and their intensity can be much higher. The steady increase in cometary activity may cause more such events in the near future.”

http://www.redpillpress.com/shop/earth-changes-human-cosmic-connection-secret-history-world-series-volume-3/

The book explains the science I was looking for in the Electric Universe model and has diagrams that I couldn’t include. I have read that radioactive krypton and xenon are greenhouse gases and surmised that they would also affect the electrical charge of the air. Massive amounts of Krypton-85 are being released and increasing the conductivity of the air. The EPA has proposed a rule change to limit the amounts of Krypton-85 allowed to be released. Nuke spokesman, Conca, has already launched attacks against the rule change. Maybe the EPA is just looking for a pay raise and the rule will not change.

Here is an hour long video of webs I recorded at sunset jst back in March but hadn’t posted. The first half shows the rain and lights starting to come on and the last half shows the webs. This video seemed to support the theory of webs as orbs forming from the radioactive fallout causing the raindrops to stick to the lens.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/0fpufy6f57ba23x/3-20%202014%201800%20sunset%20webs.flv
Hope all is well with you and yours, stay out of those dust storms.

Horse

1 comment:

  1. Actually, that site must be notorious for static discharge, wouldn't one? Ball-lighting anyone?

    Anyway, the "cometary" part of the lightning discussion might have better referred to phenomenon known as "positive" lightning, which is lightning where the polarity of the electron flow is reversed. Was there any relation to comets recently advanced? Learn something new every day, my "mantra".

    Remember all that 131I from the initial atmospheric release?
    Due to it's 8 day half-life, it's all Xenon gas now. Was taught incorrectly that xenon was a member of "Inert Gasses" otherwise known as "Noble Gasses". Apparently, xenon can react with ozone. Am not certain temperature range of that reaction though (etc). Would that include deuteriated & tritiated combo's available 'to go"?
    Is part of the "smog" i see (&perhaps East Pacific too) partly xenated compounds & other "kryptonites"???
    IIRC, these "Noble Gasses" are prime constituent(s) of such technological wonders as "halogen" bulbs & plasma TV's.

    While viewing any of these webs, i always note the immediate background of each, FWIW.

    Let's hope the light shows don't get any more dramatic or pronounced. :o

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.